Dickstein v. Sussman
248 A.D. 897, 291 N.Y.S. 411, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7996
Opinion
In an action on a bond which originally had been secured by a second mortgage, the lien of which was destroyed prior to the commencement of this action by a judgment of foreclosure and sale in an action brought by the first mortgagee, orders granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on authority of Weisel v. Hagdahl Realty Co., Inc. (241 App. Div. 314). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dickstein v. Sussman, 248 A.D. 897, 291 N.Y.S. 411, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 897 (Dickstein v. Sussman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weisel v. Hagdahl Realty Co.
241 A.D. 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)