Dickson v. State

71 S.W.2d 1100, 126 Tex. Crim. 332, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 672
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 23, 1934
DocketNo. 16793.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 S.W.2d 1100 (Dickson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dickson v. State, 71 S.W.2d 1100, 126 Tex. Crim. 332, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 672 (Tex. 1934).

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge. —

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of an aggravated assault and battery, and his *333 punishment assessed at confinement in the county jail for a term of 18 months.

There are a number of objections to the court’s charge and also a number of bills of exceptions in the record, but in the absence of a statement of facts we are unable to appraise the bills. This being a misdemeanor case, if the appellant was not satisfied with the court’s charge, he was required in addition to his objections to same to prepare, present and request the submission of special charges, which he failed to do in the instant case.

No fundamental error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Baptist Church of Taft v. West
120 S.W.2d 528 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 S.W.2d 1100, 126 Tex. Crim. 332, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickson-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.