Dickson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Dickson v. State

1934 OK CR 89, 34 P.2d 607, 56 Okla. Crim. 84, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 28, 1934

DocketNo. A-8706.

StatusPublished

This text of 1934 OK CR 89 (Dickson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dickson v. State, 1934 OK CR 89, 34 P.2d 607, 56 Okla. Crim. 84, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35 (Okla. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of McCurtain county of larceny of an automobile, and sentenced to serve a term of 15 years in the state penitentiary. The *85 principal contention made is that under the record the punishment assessed is excessive and that justice requires a modification.

We are convinced that under the testimony the conviction should be sustained. The judgment is therefore modified by a reduction of sentence from 15 years in the penitentiary to 5 years, and, as modified, the case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of McCurtain county of larceny of an automobile, and sentenced to serve a term of 15 years in the state penitentiary. The *85 principal contention made is that under the record the punishment assessed is excessive and that justice requires a modification.

We are convinced that under the testimony the conviction should be sustained. The judgment is therefore modified by a reduction of sentence from 15 years in the penitentiary to 5 years, and, as modified, the case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1934 OK CR 89, 34 P.2d 607, 56 Okla. Crim. 84, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1934.