Dickson v. State of Nevada

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided June 23, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-00999·Unknown

Opinion

Case No.: 2:21-cv-0999-JAD-EJY Lyle Edward Dickson,

Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendation and Dismissing Claims v. State of Nevada, et al., [ECF No. 3]

Defendants Lyle E. Dickson brings this employment action over the treatment he received during, and termination from, his job at the State of Nevada’s Housing Division. Because he is proceeding in forma pauperis, the magistrate judge screened Dickson’s complaint and entered a report and recommendation.1 The deadline for Dickson to object to that recommendation was June 21, 2021, and Dickson neither objected nor moved to extend his time to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”2 Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ADOPTED in its entirety: • Plaintiff’s claims for sex discrimination and retaliation may proceed against the State of Nevada and Nevada Housing Division under Title VII, and plaintiff may seek prospective injunctive relief for these claims; 1 ECF No. 3. 2 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 1 ] e Plaintiff's Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) claims are dismissed with prejudice; e Plaintiff's pendant state law claims against the State of Nevada and the Nevada Housing Division are dismissed with prejudice; e Plaintiffs Title VII claims and pendant Nevada state law claims against the individual defendants are dismissed with prejudice; e Plaintiff's claims for monetary damages and retroactive injunctive relief against the State of Nevada and the Nevada Housing Division are dismissed with prejudice; e Plaintiff's Nevada state law discrimination claims based on race, color, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, and national origin against the State of Nevada and Nevada Housing Division are dismissed without prejudice to his ability to file a complaint in state court based on these allegations; e Plaintiffs Title VII race discrimination claim against the State of Nevada and Nevada Housing Division are dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Complaint [ECF No. 5] 1s deemed timely, and I refer this matter to the magistrate judge to determine whether further screening is necessary or to issue a further order regarding summons and service.

USS. District Judge J ennifer Al. Dorsey Dated: June 23, 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickson v. State of Nevada, (D. Nev. 2021).

Dickson v. State of Nevada (Dickson v. State of Nevada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schmidt v. Johnstone
263 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Arizona, 2003)