Dickson v. Rucho

135 S. Ct. 1843, 191 L. Ed. 2d 719, 83 U.S.L.W. 3799, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2744
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 20, 2015
DocketNo. 14–839.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 135 S. Ct. 1843 (Dickson v. Rucho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dickson v. Rucho, 135 S. Ct. 1843, 191 L. Ed. 2d 719, 83 U.S.L.W. 3799, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2744 (U.S. 2015).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama,575 U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 1257, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Covington v. North Carolina
283 F. Supp. 3d 410 (M.D. North Carolina, 2018)
Dickson v. Rucho
368 N.C. 481 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2015)
Calla Wright v. State of North Carolina
787 F.3d 256 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S. Ct. 1843, 191 L. Ed. 2d 719, 83 U.S.L.W. 3799, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickson-v-rucho-scotus-2015.