Dickson v. Kansas City Life Ins.
This text of 79 F.2d 988 (Dickson v. Kansas City Life Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action to recover damages on account of an alleged conspiracy to slander and defame the good name [989]*989of the plaintiff. At the conclusion of the testimony, the trial judge properly held that there was no evidence of the conspiracy alleged but submitted the case to the jury as a case of libel and slander. While we do not approve as technically correct some of the passages of the charge of which error is assigned, we are satisfied from a careful examination of the record that the plaintiff was in ño way prejudiced thereby and that none of the errors complained of could have affected the result. The judgment appealed from will accordingly be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 F.2d 988, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickson-v-kansas-city-life-ins-ca4-1935.