Dickson v. Jones

Fourth Circuit

Dickson v. Jones

408 F. App'x 690

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2011·No. No. 10-2193·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John M. Dickson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(l) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dickson v. Jones, No. 4:10-cv-00096-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 23, 2010; entered Aug. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten[692]*692tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John M. Dickson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(l) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dickson v. Jones, No. 4:10-cv-00096-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 23, 2010; entered Aug. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten[692]*692tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dickson v. Jones, 408 F. App'x 690 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

408 F. App'x 690 (Dickson v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related