Dickson v. Ford

419 U.S. 1085, 95 S. Ct. 672
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 23, 1974
DocketNo. 74-67
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 419 U.S. 1085 (Dickson v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dickson v. Ford, 419 U.S. 1085, 95 S. Ct. 672 (1974).

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. W. D. Tex. This is an appeal, assertedly brought under 28 U. S. C. § 1253, from a three-judge court order dismissing a complaint which sought to enjoin a federal statute upon the ground of its unconstitutionality, 28 U. S. C. § 2282. The court found the case “non-justiciable” because the appellant lacked standing to sue and because the case involved a “political question.” Where a three-judge court dismisses a complaint as being non justiciable, appeal does not lie to this Court under 28 U. S. C. § 1253. Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit Union, ante, p. 90. Accordingly, the order is vacated and case remanded so that a fresh order may be entered from which a timely appeal may be taken to the United States Court of Appeals. 28 U. S. C. § 1291.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 U.S. 1085, 95 S. Ct. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickson-v-ford-scotus-1974.