Dickson v. Ferullo
96 A.D.2d 745, 465 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19335
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 11, 1983·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Whether contempt sanctions under CPLR 5251 are applied in a particular case is a matter of judicial discretion (6 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5251.07). The court did not abuse its discretion in this case by refusing to hold the judgment debtor in contempt while ordering him to comply with the information subpoena. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J. — contempt.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dickson v. Ferullo, 96 A.D.2d 745, 465 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
96 A.D.2d 745 (Dickson v. Ferullo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sara ZZ. v. Matthew A.
77 A.D.3d 1059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Torah v. Kesher International Trading Corp.
246 A.D.2d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Young v. Young
130 Misc. 2d 527 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)