Dickson v. Ferullo
This text of 96 A.D.2d 745 (Dickson v. Ferullo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Whether contempt sanctions under CPLR 5251 are applied in a particular case is a matter of judicial discretion (6 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5251.07). The court did not abuse its discretion in this case by refusing to hold the judgment debtor in contempt while ordering him to comply with the information subpoena. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J. — contempt.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 A.D.2d 745, 465 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickson-v-ferullo-nyappdiv-1983.