Dicks v. Nago

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 2022
DocketSCEC-22-0000711
StatusPublished

This text of Dicks v. Nago (Dicks v. Nago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dicks v. Nago, (haw 2022).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX 15-DEC-2022 01:27 PM Dkt. 14 ORD

SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________

KARL ORLANDO DICKS, Plaintiff,

vs.

SCOTT T. NAGO, in his official capacity as Chief Elections Officer for the Office of Elections, State of Hawaiʻi, REESE R. NAKAMURA in his capacity as Deputy Attorney General, State of Hawaiʻi, and PATRICIA T. OHARA, in her capacity as Deputy Attorney General, State of Hawaiʻi, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DISMISSING ELECTION COMPLAINT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the election complaint filed on

November 28, 2022, the motion to dismiss or for summary judgment

filed on December 2, 2022, and the record, this court’s original

jurisdiction to hear election contests is derived from Hawaiʻi

Revised Statutes (HRS) § 11-172 (Supp. 2021), which requires an

election complaint to “set forth any causes or causes . . . that

could cause a difference in the election results.” Plaintiff’s complaint states it seeks only a

“[d]eclaratory [j]udgment of [f]acts, Rule 57 HRCP without

[r]elief.” The complaint does not “set forth any cause or

causes . . . that could cause a difference in the election

results.” See HRS § 11-172. We thus decline to address the

merits of the complaint because none of them amount to errors

that could change the outcome of an election. See Lewis v.

Cayetano, 72 Haw. 499, 503, 823 P.2d 738, 741 (1992) (declining

to address the merits of an issue because, even if the

contention were accepted, the election results would not have

changed and the plaintiffs would not be entitled to relief).

It is ordered that the complaint is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 15, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. Cayetano
823 P.2d 738 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dicks v. Nago, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dicks-v-nago-haw-2022.