Dickman v. Beverly Manufacturing Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida

Dickman v. Beverly Manufacturing Corp.

189 So. 2d 611, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3195

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 15, 1966

DocketNo. 34707

StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 2d 611 (Dickman v. Beverly Manufacturing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dickman v. Beverly Manufacturing Corp., 189 So. 2d 611, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3195 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and have heard oral arguments. We find that in the entry of the Order under attack the respondent Commission did not deviate from • the essential requirements of the law. The petition for writ of cer-tiorari and the petition for fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and BARNS (Retired), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and have heard oral arguments. We find that in the entry of the Order under attack the respondent Commission did not deviate from • the essential requirements of the law. The petition for writ of cer-tiorari and the petition for fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and BARNS (Retired), JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 So. 2d 611, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickman-v-beverly-manufacturing-corp-fla-1966.