Dickinson v. . Van Noorden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Dickinson v. . Van Noorden

4 N.C. 109

DecidedJanuary 5, 1814

StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.C. 109 (Dickinson v. . Van Noorden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dickinson v. . Van Noorden, 4 N.C. 109 (N.C. 1814).

Pincite

Opinion

1. Whether the bill is negotiable by endorsement, not being payable to order.

2. If it is, can the endorsement in full be struck out at the trial, and the action be supported in the name of the payee?

The latter question only was decided by the Court. It has been already decided by this Court, in the case of MargaretGittings v. Ward, that a full endorsement of a negotiable instrument may be stricken out on the trial. The correctness of this opinion is supported by the opinion of the Chief Justice of the United States and the practice in the court in which he presides. If the instrument *Page 87 be not negotiable, there surely can be no objection to striking out such endorsement.

Judgment for plaintiff.

NOTE. — See Dook v. Caswell, 2 N.C. 18, and the cases referred to in the note.

Cited: Phifer v. Giles, 13 N.C. 498; Howell v. McCracken, 87 N.C. 399.

(110)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1. Whether the bill is negotiable by endorsement, not being payable to order.

2. If it is, can the endorsement in full be struck out at the trial, and the action be supported in the name of the payee?

The latter question only was decided by the Court. It has been already decided by this Court, in the case of MargaretGittings v. Ward, that a full endorsement of a negotiable instrument may be stricken out on the trial. The correctness of this opinion is supported by the opinion of the Chief Justice of the United States and the practice in the court in which he presides. If the instrument *Page 87 be not negotiable, there surely can be no objection to striking out such endorsement.

Judgment for plaintiff.

NOTE. — See Dook v. Caswell, 2 N.C. 18, and the cases referred to in the note.

Cited: Phifer v. Giles, 13 N.C. 498; Howell v. McCracken, 87 N.C. 399.

(110)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 N.C. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickinson-v-van-noorden-nc-1814.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack