Dickinson v. Swift & Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dickinson v. Swift & Co.

277 So. 2d 560, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6752

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 22, 1973·No. No. S-120·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See State ex rel. Drum Service Company of Florida v. Kirk, 234 So.2d 358 (Fla.1970) and Dickinson et al. v. Stauffer Chemical Company, etc., 268 So.2d 396 (Fla.App.1972).

CARROLL, DONALD, K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See State ex rel. Drum Service Company of Florida v. Kirk, 234 So.2d 358 (Fla.1970) and Dickinson et al. v. Stauffer Chemical Company, etc., 268 So.2d 396 (Fla.App.1972).

CARROLL, DONALD, K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Dickinson v. Swift & Co., 277 So. 2d 560, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6752 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

277 So. 2d 560 (Dickinson v. Swift & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related