Dickinson v. State Bank
This text of 16 N.J.L. 354 (Dickinson v. State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The practice has been for the plaintiff to have his option, either by proceeding here, or taking a procedendo.
Habeas Corpus is a common law, not statutory writ.
The statute requires bail for the plaintiff’s security, which he may waive and proceed here. So also in many cases of Certiorari, the act is equally imperative in requiring security.
Cited in Vanatta v. Morris Canal and Banking Co., 2 Harr. 159
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 N.J.L. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickinson-v-state-bank-nj-1838.