Dickinson v. State Bank
16 N.J.L. 354
Opinion
The practice has been for the plaintiff to have his option, either by proceeding here, or taking a procedendo.
Habeas Corpus is a common law, not statutory writ.
The statute requires bail for the plaintiff’s security, which he may waive and proceed here. So also in many cases of Certiorari, the act is equally imperative in requiring security.
Cited in Vanatta v. Morris Canal and Banking Co., 2 Harr. 159
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dickinson v. State Bank, 16 N.J.L. 354 (N.J. 1838).
16 N.J.L. 354 (Dickinson v. State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Court of Common Pleas
61 A.2d 503 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1948)