Dickinson v. State

106 So. 915, 21 Ala. App. 667
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 1925·No. 1 Div. 631.·Published

Opinion

SAMFOBD, J.

There is no legal evidence connecting the defendant with the possession of the whisky charged to have been in his possession. The general charge should have been given for defendant, as requested. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickinson v. State, 106 So. 915, 21 Ala. App. 667 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

106 So. 915 (Dickinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.