Dickinson v. State

106 So. 915, 21 Ala. App. 667
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 15, 1925
Docket1 Div. 631.
StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 915 (Dickinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dickinson v. State, 106 So. 915, 21 Ala. App. 667 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

SAMFOBD, J.

There is no legal evidence connecting the defendant with the possession of the whisky charged to have been in his possession. The general charge should have been given for defendant, as requested. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 So. 915, 21 Ala. App. 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickinson-v-state-alactapp-1925.