Dickinson v. Linington

48 N.E. 44, 168 Ill. 198
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 1, 1897
StatusPublished

This text of 48 N.E. 44 (Dickinson v. Linington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dickinson v. Linington, 48 N.E. 44, 168 Ill. 198 (Ill. 1897).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Magruder

delivered the opinion of the court:

Upon the hearing of this case in the Superior Court of Cook county, that court sustained the demurrers of the present plaintiffs in error to the amended bill of complaint, and dismissed the same for want of equity. An appeal was then taken to the Appellate Court. Looking into the -record of the latter court, we find that it has entered a judgment, reversing the decree of the Superior Court, and remanding the cause for such other and further proceedings as to law and justice shall appertain. The judgment thus entered by the Appellate Court is not a final judgment. (Buck v. County of Hamilton, 99 Ill. 507; Gade v. Forest Glen Brick Co. 158 id. 39.) No appeal lies from the Appellate Court to this court to review such a judgment; nor can the same be reviewed by a writ of error issued from this court to the Appellate Court. An order will accordingly be entered, dismissing the present writ of error.

Writ dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buck v. County of Hamilton
99 Ill. 507 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 N.E. 44, 168 Ill. 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickinson-v-linington-ill-1897.