Home/Supreme Court/Dickinson v. First National Bank of Homestead

Dickinson v. First National Bank of Homestead

393 U.S. 409
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 27, 1969
Docket741
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 393 U.S. 409 (Dickinson v. First National Bank of Homestead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dickinson v. First National Bank of Homestead, 393 U.S. 409 (1969).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farris v. Stepp
D. Colorado, 2021
Bank of Texas v. Childs
615 S.W.2d 810 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1981)
United States v. State Board of Equalization
639 F.2d 458 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. State Board of Equalization
450 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. California, 1978)
Estate of Holdeen v. Commissioner
1975 T.C. Memo. 29 (U.S. Tax Court, 1975)
First National Bank v. Commissioner
1969 NMCA 090 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1969)
First Nat. Bank of Santa Fe v. Commissioner of Rev.
460 P.2d 64 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1969)
Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. v. Buscaglia
246 N.E.2d 361 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
393 U.S. 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickinson-v-first-national-bank-of-homestead-scotus-1969.