Dickinson v. Boyle

34 Mass. 78
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1835
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 Mass. 78 (Dickinson v. Boyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dickinson v. Boyle, 34 Mass. 78 (Mass. 1835).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where the act complained of, is admitted to have been done with force, and to constitute a proper ground for an action of trespass vi et armis, all the damage to the plaintiff, of which such injurious act was the efficient cause, and for which the plaintiff is entitled to recover in any form, may be recovered in such action, although in point of time such damage did not occur till some time after the act done. Where special or peculiar damages are claimed, such as are not the usual or natural consequences of the act done, it is proper to set them forth specifically in the declaration, by way of aggravation, that the defendant may have due notice of the claim.

Judgment on the verdict for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duquenoy v. Dorgan
18 Mass. App. Dec. 52 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Mass. 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickinson-v-boyle-mass-1835.