Dickinson Bros. Grain & Hay Co. v. Town of Owasso

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Dickinson Bros. Grain & Hay Co. v. Town of Owasso

1913 OK CR 175, 129 P. 707, 9 Okla. Crim. 713, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 66

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 8, 1913

DocketNo. A-1443.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 175 (Dickinson Bros. Grain & Hay Co. v. Town of Owasso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dickinson Bros. Grain & Hay Co. v. Town of Owasso, 1913 OK CR 175, 129 P. 707, 9 Okla. Crim. 713, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 66 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Tulsa county imposing a fine of ten dollars on the plaintiff in error for violating a town ordinance of the town of Owasso, the plaintiff in error having been prosecuted in the county court on an appeal from the municipal court of the town of Owasso.

Counsel for the defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the following grounds: First; because the proceedings were not filed in this court within sixty days from the date of *714 judgment, no extension of time having been granted by the trial court. 'Second; that this court has no jurisdiction on appeals of actions brought to enforce a town ordinance, the same not being a criminal action.

The motion is sustained as.to the first ground- and the appeal accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Tulsa county imposing a fine of ten dollars on the plaintiff in error for violating a town ordinance of the town of Owasso, the plaintiff in error having been prosecuted in the county court on an appeal from the municipal court of the town of Owasso.

Counsel for the defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the following grounds: First; because the proceedings were not filed in this court within sixty days from the date of *714 judgment, no extension of time having been granted by the trial court. 'Second; that this court has no jurisdiction on appeals of actions brought to enforce a town ordinance, the same not being a criminal action.

The motion is sustained as.to the first ground- and the appeal accordingly dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 175, 129 P. 707, 9 Okla. Crim. 713, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickinson-bros-grain-hay-co-v-town-of-owasso-oklacrimapp-1913.