Dickey v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 17, 2005
Docket04-2410
StatusUnpublished

This text of Dickey v. United States (Dickey v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dickey v. United States, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2410

CYNTHIA LOUISE DICKEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee,

SHAUNA MACKE,

Third Party Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-03-761-2)

Submitted: April 22, 2005 Decided: May 17, 2005

Before WILKINSON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey F. Brooke, HUFF, POOLE & MAHONEY, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Kent P. Porter, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; George Janis Dancigers, Ann J. Premer, MCKENRY, DANCIGERS, WARNER, DAWSON & LAKE, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Cynthia Louise Dickey appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the United States in her

action filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed

the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Dickey v. United States, No. CA-03-761-2 (E.D.

Va. Sept. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dickey v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickey-v-united-states-ca4-2005.