Dickey v. State
164 So. 915, 27 Ala. App. 630
Opinion
It is enough to say that the court has read the entire evidence in this case, sitting in banc.
We are of the opinion that it contravenes in no way our holdings in the cases of Dickey v. State, 22 Ala.App. 375, 115 So. 848, and Davis v. State (Ala.App.) 160 So. 266, 1 to hold, as we do here, that the evidence amply supported the verdict returned and the judgment rendered thereon.
The said judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
1
26 Ala.App. 370.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dickey v. State, 164 So. 915, 27 Ala. App. 630 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).
164 So. 915 (Dickey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dickey v. State
115 So. 848 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)
Davis v. State
160 So. 266 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1935)