Dickey v. South Side Atlanta Bank

162 S.E.2d 305, 118 Ga. App. 1, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 913
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1968
Docket43296
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 S.E.2d 305 (Dickey v. South Side Atlanta Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dickey v. South Side Atlanta Bank, 162 S.E.2d 305, 118 Ga. App. 1, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 913 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Whitman, Judge.

The appeal in this case is from an order sustaining the general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition for money had and received. The same is enumerated as error.

This court must apply the new rules of the Civil Practice Act regardless of when the judgment was entered below. Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263 (1) (161 SE2d 281). Accordingly, we must view the petition having regard to whether it states a claim for which relief may be granted rather than construing its allegations against the pleader and determining, after so doing, whether all the elements of a cause of action are present. See Harper v. DeFreitas, 117 Ga. App. 236 (1) (160 SE2d 260).

The complaint adequately stated a claim for relief. See Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 673 (Code Ann. § 81A-308), for all that is required.

Judgment reversed.

Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Lariscy
165 S.E.2d 315 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E.2d 305, 118 Ga. App. 1, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickey-v-south-side-atlanta-bank-gactapp-1968.