Dickey v. Sleeper

13 Mass. 244
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided June 15, 1816·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The intention of the parties to this submission was, to effect a final adjustment of the concerns of a trading company, in which they had been connected, and *of which, it should seem, the plaintiff had been the agent. One of the company, George Cox, was dead, and, it appears, a considerable sum of money was due to his estate from the company. John Cox, naming himself administrator of the deceased, became a party to the submission ; and the arbitrators awarded him a sum of money in his capacity of administrator. In this they did not exceed their powers. But, if they had in that particular, the defendant could not avail himself of it. The bond is the several deed of each obligor. The signature, also, of John Cox must be taken with reference to the description of him in the bond.

Replication adjudged good.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickey v. Sleeper, 13 Mass. 244 (Mass. 1816).

13 Mass. 244 (Dickey v. Sleeper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. District of Columbia
9 App. D.C. 360 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1896)
Upton v. Stoddard
47 N.H. 167 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1866)
Bennett v. Pierce
28 Conn. 314 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1859)
Coffin v. Cottle
21 Mass. 454 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1827)