Dickey v. Secretary of State
This text of Dickey v. Secretary of State (Dickey v. Secretary of State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE . SUPERIOR COURT PENOBSCOT, SS. CIVIL ACTION D.OCKET NO -J}.P-Q8-004 \i/I~ c f'!.. / 'I - /,)} c> )'
IAN DICKEY, FILED & ENTERED SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff, v. ORDER ~itJ 24 200B STATE OF MAINE, SECRETARY OF STATE, BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES, PENOBSCOT COUNTY Defendant.
Hearing was held on the plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order and
preliminary injunction on March 7, 2008. The parties appeared by counsel. In his motion
the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendant from enforcing an administrative suspension
of his license to operate a motor vehicle, a suspension for 275 days as a result of a report
that he had operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and that he
failed to submit to a test to determine his blood alcohol level. The plaintiff requested a
hearing in a timely fashion but was not provided a hearing until 44 days after the
request and did not receive a decision until 15 additional days had elapsed. According
to 29-A MRSA 2483(2), the Secretary of State shall conduct such a hearing and issue a
decision within 30 days. Both parties agree that to prevail, the petitioner must
demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits as well as irreparable harm.
Although the court may agree with the irreparable harm claim, the court does
not find that the petitioner has a likelihood of success on the merits. The court does not
read McGee v. Secretary of State, 2006 ME 50, 896 A.2d 933 as overruling the case the
state relies upon, Davric Maine Corporation v. Maine Harness Racin Commission, 1999
ME 99, 732 A.2d 289. The fact that the statute establishing administrative hearing time
limits, 29-A MRSA 2483(2), does not contain a penalty provision for the state's violation of the time limits still distinguishes the case from McGee, which dealt with a statute
containing a specific sanction should its time limit provisions be violated. In the absence
of such a penalty provision, it is likely that the statutory time limits are directory, not
mandatory.
Motion Denied.
The clerk is directed to incorporate this Order into the docket by reference.
Dated: March 14, 2008 tPAJ:2 WILLIAM ANDERSON JUSTICE, SUPERIOR COURT Date Filed _--,2""/---=:l4u../-",0-,-7 _ Penobscot Docket No. _~A~P,-----,=2,-,,0,-,,0c:::8~-24 _ County
Action Rule 80C Appeal ASSIGNED TO JUSTICE KEVIN M. CUDDY REASSIGNED TO WILLIAM R. ANDERSON
STATE OF MAINE, SECRETARY OF STATE, IAN D. DICKEY Ys. BUREAUOF MOTOR VEHICLES Plaintiff's Attorney Defendant's Attorney McCloskey, Mina, Cunniff & Dilworth, LLC Gwendolyn Thomas, AAG 27 Bellevue Ave Assistant Attorney General Bangor ME 04401 6 State House Station BY: Jay P. McCloskey Esq. Augusta, ME 04333-0006
Date of Entry
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dickey v. Secretary of State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickey-v-secretary-of-state-mesuperct-2008.