Dickey v. City of Chicago

53 N.E. 395, 179 Ill. 184
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided February 22, 1899·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the county court of Cook county confirming" a special assessment. The ordinance providing for the improvement fails to state the height of the curb required to. be constructed on each side of the street, and on account of this defect it is claimed that the ordinance is invalid. The ordinance involved, as respects the height of the curb, is substantially like an ordinance held to be invalid in Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263, and the ruling in that case must control here.

As to the property set out and 'described in the assignment of errors in the record the judgment of confirmation will be reversed and the cause will be remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickey v. City of Chicago, 53 N.E. 395, 179 Ill. 184 (Ill. 1899).

53 N.E. 395 (Dickey v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re The Interest of T.P.
2021 IL App (1st) 210318-U (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2021)
People v. Kerfoot
184 Cal. App. 2d 622 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)