Dickey v. City of Chicago
This text of 53 N.E. 395 (Dickey v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the county court of Cook county confirming" a special assessment. The ordinance providing for the improvement fails to state the height of the curb required to. be constructed on each side of the street, and on account of this defect it is claimed that the ordinance is invalid. The ordinance involved, as respects the height of the curb, is substantially like an ordinance held to be invalid in Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263, and the ruling in that case must control here.
As to the property set out and 'described in the assignment of errors in the record the judgment of confirmation will be reversed and the cause will be remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 N.E. 395, 179 Ill. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickey-v-city-of-chicago-ill-1899.