Dickey v. Aid Laboratories, Inc.

404 So. 2d 119, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18929
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 1981·No. No. 79-407·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This defendant’s appeal presents solely a question as to whether the trial court erred in determining that personal service of process was properly effected on defendant. We affirm. In the circumstances of this case, the issue of service of process was a question of fact which was decided on conflicting evidence. Ample evidence is contained in the record to support the court’s conclusion and the judgment below is therefore affirmed. See Klosenski v. Flaherty, 116 So.2d 767 (Fla.1960); McIntosh v. Wibbeler, 106 So.2d 195 (Fla.1958); and Winky’s, Inc. v. Francis, 229 So.2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., and DOWNEY and BERA-NEK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickey v. Aid Laboratories, Inc., 404 So. 2d 119, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18929 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

404 So. 2d 119 (Dickey v. Aid Laboratories, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winky's, Inc. v. Francis
229 So. 2d 903 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
McIntosh v. Wibbeler
106 So. 2d 195 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Klosenski v. Flaherty
116 So. 2d 767 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)