Dickerson v. United States

2002 DNH 192
District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided October 28, 2002·No. CV-02-296-M·Published

Opinion

Dickerson v . United States CV-02-296-M 10/28/02 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Tyrone Dickerson, Petitioner

v. Civil N o . 02-296-M Opinion N o . 2002 DNH 192 United States of America, Respondent

O R D E R

Petitioner, Tyrone Dickerson, seeks habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He was convicted by a jury of possessing a controlled substance (crack cocaine) with the intent to distribute i t , in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). His conviction was affirmed on appeal. See United States v . Dickerson, N o . 00-2500, slip o p . (1st Cir. June 2 1 , 2001).

In his petition, Dickerson argues that the jury did not necessarily convict him of possessing crack (as opposed to powder) cocaine, and that his counsel provided ineffective assistance i n , essentially, failing to advocate for a guideline sentencing range based upon possession with intent to distribute powder rather than crack cocaine. The petition is without merit.

The jury convicted Dickerson of possessing crack cocaine with the intent to distribute i t . The substance at issue was

positively identified by a testifying chemist (Mr. Hartman) as crack (“I determined it to be crack cocaine.”), and all the evidence presented was more than sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. See Id. Petitioner was properly sentenced based upon the allocable drug quantities, which resulted in a mandatory minimum sentence of 120 months in prison. Counsel hardly rendered ineffective assistance, since he made no errors that adversely affected any of petitioner’s substantial rights and the representation provided fell well above the standard of reasonable effective assistance. See e.g., Gonzalez-Soberal v . United States, 244 F.3d 273, 277 (1st Cir. 2001) (citing Strickland v . Washington, 466 U.S. 6 6 8 , 687 (1984).

Because the motion and the files and the records of the case conclusively show that the petitioner is entitled to no relief, the petition is denied and the case dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

Steven J. McAuliffe

United States District Judge

October 2 8 , 2002

cc: Tyrone Dickeron, pro se Peter E . Papps, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickerson v. United States, 2002 DNH 192 (D.N.H. 2002).

2002 DNH 192 (Dickerson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manuel Gonz Lez-Soberal v. United States
244 F.3d 273 (First Circuit, 2001)