Dickerson v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

365 So. 2d 794, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16878
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1978·No. No. 78-893·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of argument of counsel, the briefs and record submitted, we believe that the trial judge was technically correct in his ruling herein based upon Avila South Condominium Association, Inc. v. Kappa Corporation, 347 So.2d 599 (Fla. 1977), and consequently, we affirm his order. However, we believe justice in this matter would best be served by directing the trial court to permit those parties dropped as a result of his order to be reinstated as parties and permit appellants to amend their complaint in order to assert with more specificity their individual claims, if possible, see Breslerman v. Dorten, Inc., 362 So.2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED with directions.

GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickerson v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 365 So. 2d 794, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16878 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

365 So. 2d 794 (Dickerson v. Travelers Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Avila South Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Kappa Corp.
347 So. 2d 599 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Breslerman v. Dorten, Inc.
362 So. 2d 37 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)