Dickerson v. Swanson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dickerson v. Swanson

537 So. 2d 717, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 505, 1989 WL 9137

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 1989

DocketNo. 87-2973

StatusPublished

This text of 537 So. 2d 717 (Dickerson v. Swanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dickerson v. Swanson, 537 So. 2d 717, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 505, 1989 WL 9137 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. It is the trial court’s findings “at the present time,” that is to say, the date of his Final Judgment, September 24,1987, to which this opinion is addressed. We assume, if the passage of time has given rise to a substantial change of the facts considered below, the aggrieved party will consider having the issue of visitation revisited by the trial judge.

GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. It is the trial court’s findings “at the present time,” that is to say, the date of his Final Judgment, September 24,1987, to which this opinion is addressed. We assume, if the passage of time has given rise to a substantial change of the facts considered below, the aggrieved party will consider having the issue of visitation revisited by the trial judge.

GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 So. 2d 717, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 505, 1989 WL 9137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickerson-v-swanson-fladistctapp-1989.