Dickerson v. State
170 S.W. 1198, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 650
Opinion
Appellant was convicted for violating the prohibition law, fense being a misdemeanor. There is neither a statement of facts nor bill of exceptions. No. question is raised which can be considered m the absence of these. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dickerson v. State, 170 S.W. 1198, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 650 (Tex. 1914).
170 S.W. 1198 (Dickerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.