Dickerson v. Nash

74 Ga. 357, 1884 Ga. LEXIS 385
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 11, 1884·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Blandeord, Justice.

[Dickerson, as administrator of Sarah Jennings, deceased, advertised certain land for sale, and a claim was interposed by Nash, as agent for Healan et al. The case was submitted to the presiding judge without a jury, and from his finding the following facts appear : Hastings Jennings died, leaving the land in dispute, of the value of $160.00, and personalty of the value of $124.00. The realty and personalty were set apart as a twelve months’ support to his widow and four minor children by a former wife. The widow consumed all the personalty. (The bill of exceptions states that the year’s support was set apart to the widow, without notice to the minors, and that they did not live with her at that time or afterwards.) The widow having died, administration was had on her estate; the administrator was proceeding to sell, and the claim was mterpo'sed, as above stated, by the children of her deceased husband. The court sustained the claim, and the administrator excepted.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickerson v. Nash, 74 Ga. 357, 1884 Ga. LEXIS 385 (Ga. 1884).

74 Ga. 357 (Dickerson v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grace v. Rouse
44 S.E.2d 762 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Walden v. Walden
12 S.E.2d 345 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Moore v. Pittman
196 S.E. 50 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Williams v. Rosette
170 S.E. 373 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Bank of Cuthbert v. Taylor
123 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)