Dickerson v. Hudson

10 So. 2d 700, 201 La. 915, 1942 La. LEXIS 1309
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 4, 1942
DocketNo. 36854.
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 10 So. 2d 700 (Dickerson v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dickerson v. Hudson, 10 So. 2d 700, 201 La. 915, 1942 La. LEXIS 1309 (La. 1942).

Opinion

McCALEB, Justice.

The plaintiff and appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the appellant has failed to perfect it within one year after the judgment was signed by the timely filing of the appeal bond fixed by the judge. The judgment appealed from was rendered, read and signed in open court on July 8th, 1941. A devolutive appeal was applied for on June 23, 1942, and an order granting the appeal and fixing the bond was signed on that day. However, the appeal was not perfected by the filing of the bond until July 25, 1942, or over one year after the rendition and signing of the judgment.

It is the established jurisprudence of this State that “The time limit of one year, allowed by article 593 of the Code of Practice, for the taking of a devolutive appeal, is the limit of time in which the taking of the appeal must be completed by the filing of the appeal bond, in cases where a bond is required by law and by the order granting 1;he appeal, * * * See Mount Olive Baptist Church v. New Zion Baptist Church, 198 La. 896, 5 So.2d 144, and authorities there cited.

It is, therefore, obvious in this case that, since the appeal was not perfected by *917 the filing of bond within the year elapsing from the finality of the judgment below, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the proceeding.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

ROGERS, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Piper v. Central Louisiana Electric Co.
542 So. 2d 7 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)
Great American Insurance Companies v. East
264 So. 2d 761 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1972)
Dounson v. Faia
246 So. 2d 729 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1971)
Smith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
239 So. 2d 738 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)
Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Guarisco Enterprises, Inc.
234 So. 2d 469 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)
Moon v. Moon
232 So. 2d 838 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)
Sims v. Louisiana Private Schools, Inc.
223 So. 2d 187 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)
LaRose v. LaRose
211 So. 2d 95 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1968)
Aetna Insurance Co. v. Robinson
199 So. 2d 369 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1967)
McCrory v. Link Belt Co.
195 So. 2d 172 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1967)
Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
180 So. 2d 710 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1965)
Britt v. Brocato
170 So. 2d 516 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)
Armant v. Miljak
118 So. 2d 516 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)
Kotteman v. Grevemberg
96 So. 2d 604 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1957)
City of Baton Rouge v. Kiper
96 So. 2d 241 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1957)
Thompson v. Bamburg
93 So. 2d 666 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1957)
Schouest v. Loewenthal
58 So. 2d 425 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1952)
Arnold v. Arnold
46 So. 2d 298 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 So. 2d 700, 201 La. 915, 1942 La. LEXIS 1309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickerson-v-hudson-la-1942.