Dickerman v. Lomas Nettleton, Trustee

Connecticut Superior Court

Dickerman v. Lomas Nettleton, Trustee

1 Conn. Super. Ct. 144

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided March 28, 1935·No. File No. 46416·Published

Opinion

The answer in this case is voluminous and in some paragraph violates the rule against the pleading of evidential matters, but threaded through the whole of the nineteen paragraphs a proper, legal defense can be discerned. The motion to expunge would in this case, if granted, perform the function of a demurrer, and it has been repeatedly held that it can not be made to serve that purpose.

The motion to expunge is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The answer in this case is voluminous and in some paragraph violates the rule against the pleading of evidential matters, but threaded through the whole of the nineteen paragraphs a proper, legal defense can be discerned. The motion to expunge would in this case, if granted, perform the function of a demurrer, and it has been repeatedly held that it can not be made to serve that purpose.

The motion to expunge is therefore denied.

Dickerman v. Lomas Nettleton, Trustee, 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 144 (Colo. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

1 Conn. Super. Ct. 144 (Dickerman v. Lomas Nettleton, Trustee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.