Dickerman v. Lomas Nettleton Co.

Connecticut Superior Court

Dickerman v. Lomas Nettleton Co.

1 Conn. Supp. 144, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 61

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMarch 28, 1935

DocketFile #46416

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Conn. Supp. 144 (Dickerman v. Lomas Nettleton Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dickerman v. Lomas Nettleton Co., 1 Conn. Supp. 144, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 61 (Colo. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PEASLEY, J.

The answer in this case is voluminous and in some paragraph violates the rule against the pleading of evidential matters, but threaded through the whole of the nineteen paragraphs a proper, legal defense can be discerned. The motion to expunge would in this case, if granted, perform the function of a demurrer, and it has been repeatedly held that it can not be made to serve that purpose.

The motion to expunge is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEASLEY, J.

The answer in this case is voluminous and in some paragraph violates the rule against the pleading of evidential matters, but threaded through the whole of the nineteen paragraphs a proper, legal defense can be discerned. The motion to expunge would in this case, if granted, perform the function of a demurrer, and it has been repeatedly held that it can not be made to serve that purpose.

The motion to expunge is therefore denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Conn. Supp. 144, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickerman-v-lomas-nettleton-co-connsuperct-1935.