Dickerhoof v. City of Akron

Ohio Supreme Court

Dickerhoof v. City of Akron

93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 488

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 1, 1916

DocketNo. 15022

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 488 (Dickerhoof v. City of Akron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dickerhoof v. City of Akron, 93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 488 (Ohio 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

This court finds that there was no dispute between the parties as to any constitutional question arising under the constitution of this state or of the United States and no such question is presented to this court.

This court further finds that the claims and erroneous proceedings referred to by the plaintiff were waived.

Cause dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donai-iue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This court finds that there was no dispute between the parties as to any constitutional question arising under the constitution of this state or of the United States and no such question is presented to this court.

This court further finds that the claims and erroneous proceedings referred to by the plaintiff were waived.

Cause dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donai-iue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickerhoof-v-city-of-akron-ohio-1916.