Dickerhoof v. City of Akron

Ohio Supreme Court

Dickerhoof v. City of Akron

93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 488

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 1, 1916·No. No. 15022·Published

Opinion

This court finds that there was no dispute between the parties as to any constitutional question arising under the constitution of this state or of the United States and no such question is presented to this court.

This court further finds that the claims and erroneous proceedings referred to by the plaintiff were waived.

Cause dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donai-iue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This court finds that there was no dispute between the parties as to any constitutional question arising under the constitution of this state or of the United States and no such question is presented to this court.

This court further finds that the claims and erroneous proceedings referred to by the plaintiff were waived.

Cause dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donai-iue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Dickerhoof v. City of Akron, 93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 488 (Ohio 1916).

Pincite

93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 488 (Dickerhoof v. City of Akron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.