Dicker v. Dicker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dicker v. Dicker

32 A.D.2d 956, 303 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3330

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 14, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 956 (Dicker v. Dicker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dicker v. Dicker, 32 A.D.2d 956, 303 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for divorce based on a separation decree which defendant had been awarded in 1963, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 22, 1969, as (1) denied the defendant wife’s motion to dismiss the complaint; (2) denied her motion for a counsel fee on said motion to dismiss, without prejudice to renewal at the trial, etc., and, in otherwise granting her a counsel fee, limited the allowance to $500; (3) denied her motion to increase the alimony she had been awarded in the separation decree so as to require plaintiff to pay for their adult son’s college tuition; (4) denied her motion to restrain plaintiff from entering her residence (which he does when he visits their adult son who resides there), without prejudice to renewal if warranted by plaintiff’s future conduct; and (5) granted plaintiff’s cross motion to vacate a notice to examine him before trial. Order affirmed, without costs (Schacht v. Schacht, 32 A D 2d 201; Kaplan v. Kaplan, 31 A D 2d 247). Brennan, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for divorce based on a separation decree which defendant had been awarded in 1963, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 22, 1969, as (1) denied the defendant wife’s motion to dismiss the complaint; (2) denied her motion for a counsel fee on said motion to dismiss, without prejudice to renewal at the trial, etc., and, in otherwise granting her a counsel fee, limited the allowance to $500; (3) denied her motion to increase the alimony she had been awarded in the separation decree so as to require plaintiff to pay for their adult son’s college tuition; (4) denied her motion to restrain plaintiff from entering her residence (which he does when he visits their adult son who resides there), without prejudice to renewal if warranted by plaintiff’s future conduct; and (5) granted plaintiff’s cross motion to vacate a notice to examine him before trial. Order affirmed, without costs (Schacht v. Schacht, 32 A D 2d 201; Kaplan v. Kaplan, 31 A D 2d 247). Brennan, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 956, 303 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dicker-v-dicker-nyappdiv-1969.