Dickenson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Dickenson v. State

5 S.W. 648, 24 Tex. Ct. App. 121, 1887 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 171

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 29, 1887

DocketNo. 2594

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 S.W. 648 (Dickenson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dickenson v. State, 5 S.W. 648, 24 Tex. Ct. App. 121, 1887 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 171 (Tex. Ct. App. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Willson, Judge.

A jury was waived by the defendant and the cause submitted upon the facts to the judge, who found the defendant guilty of a simple assault. In our opinion the evidence does not support the finding of the judge. ' On the contrary, the evidence shows that defendant’s horse became unmanageable, not subject to his control, ran away with him, ran against and upset the buggy in which were the ladies and the child, and thus caused the injuries for the infliction of which he has been convicted. To our minds the facts clearly show that the upsetting of the buggy was an act done by accident, and without such a degree of carelessness or negligence on the part of the defendant as rendered it criminal. (Penal Code, art. 44.) There was no intent on his part to injure, and without such an intent there could not be an assault in law. (Penal Code, art. 484.) The evidence repels the presumption of such an intent. (Donaldson v. The State, 10 Texas Ct. App., 307.)

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willson, Judge.

A jury was waived by the defendant and the cause submitted upon the facts to the judge, who found the defendant guilty of a simple assault. In our opinion the evidence does not support the finding of the judge. ' On the contrary, the evidence shows that defendant’s horse became unmanageable, not subject to his control, ran away with him, ran against and upset the buggy in which were the ladies and the child, and thus caused the injuries for the infliction of which he has been convicted. To our minds the facts clearly show that the upsetting of the buggy was an act done by accident, and without such a degree of carelessness or negligence on the part of the defendant as rendered it criminal. (Penal Code, art. 44.) There was no intent on his part to injure, and without such an intent there could not be an assault in law. (Penal Code, art. 484.) The evidence repels the presumption of such an intent. (Donaldson v. The State, 10 Texas Ct. App., 307.)

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed, and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 S.W. 648, 24 Tex. Ct. App. 121, 1887 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickenson-v-state-texapp-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack