Dickens v. State

768 S.W.2d 672, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 553, 1989 WL 39300
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 25, 1989·No. No. 55448·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Sterling Dickens, appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion (repealed January 1, 1988) after an evidentia-ry hearing. Movant’s conviction was sustained on direct appeal. State v. Dickens, 667 S.W.2d 14 (Mo.App.1984).

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickens v. State, 768 S.W.2d 672, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 553, 1989 WL 39300 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

768 S.W.2d 672 (Dickens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sterling Dickens v. Bill Armontrout
944 F.2d 461 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)