Dickens v. State

768 S.W.2d 672, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 553, 1989 WL 39300
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 25, 1989
DocketNo. 55448
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 768 S.W.2d 672 (Dickens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dickens v. State, 768 S.W.2d 672, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 553, 1989 WL 39300 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Sterling Dickens, appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion (repealed January 1, 1988) after an evidentia-ry hearing. Movant’s conviction was sustained on direct appeal. State v. Dickens, 667 S.W.2d 14 (Mo.App.1984).

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sterling Dickens v. Bill Armontrout
944 F.2d 461 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
768 S.W.2d 672, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 553, 1989 WL 39300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickens-v-state-moctapp-1989.