Dickens v. State
563 So. 2d 58, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 126, 1990 WL 57561
This text of 563 So. 2d 58 (Dickens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dickens v. State, 563 So. 2d 58, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 126, 1990 WL 57561 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT
On remand from the Alabama Supreme Court, and considering Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989), this cause is due to be affirmed because the appellant’s Rule 20 petition is procedurally barred under Temporary Rule 20.2(c), Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harris v. Reed
489 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
563 So. 2d 58, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 126, 1990 WL 57561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickens-v-state-alacrimapp-1990.