Dickens v. State
563 So. 2d 58, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 126, 1990 WL 57561
Opinion
AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT
On remand from the Alabama Supreme Court, and considering Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989), this cause is due to be affirmed because the appellant’s Rule 20 petition is procedurally barred under Temporary Rule 20.2(c), Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dickens v. State, 563 So. 2d 58, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 126, 1990 WL 57561 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).
563 So. 2d 58 (Dickens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harris v. Reed
489 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1989)