Dickens v. Dretke

136 F. App'x 675
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2005·No. 04-70029·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Petitioner-Appellant Justin Wiley Dickens seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) on three issues that the district court deemed unworthy of collateral review. Dickens seeks a COA from this Court on three claims, all of which challenge his death sentence. Dickens first argues that the evidence at the punishment phase of trial was legally insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he would commit criminal acts of violence in the future so as to constitute a continuing threat to society. Dickens also argues that his state trial, appeal, and habeas counsel were ineffective because they failed to invoke the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, an international treaty ratified by the United States Senate which prohibits the execution of offenders for crimes committed when the offender was under the age of 18.

In light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Roper v. Simmons, 1 Texas Governor Rick Perry has *676 commuted Dickens’s death sentence to life imprisonment. As Dickens petition for a COA challenges only his death sentence, and not his underlying conviction, his petition is now moot because Governor Perry has granted him the relief that he requested.

PETITION DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.,5 the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. -U.S.-125 S.Ct. 1183, 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickens v. Dretke, 136 F. App'x 675 (5th Cir. 2005).

136 F. App'x 675 (Dickens v. Dretke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bernardo Tercero v. William Stephens, Director
738 F.3d 141 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)