Dickel v. Yates
2 Dem. Sur. 229
This text of 2 Dem. Sur. 229 (Dickel v. Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dickel v. Yates, 2 Dem. Sur. 229 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1883).
Opinion
I agree with the decision in Hartwell v. McMaster 4 Redf., 389), that § 1023 of the [230]*230Code is inapplicable to the procedure of this court, and that “requests to find” only nood to be passed upon in connection with the “settlement of a case,” as provided by § 2545.
I, therefore, decline to find for or against the various propositions submitted for my determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hartwell v. McMaster
4 Redf. 389 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1880)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Dem. Sur. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickel-v-yates-nysurct-1883.