Dicke v. Safeco Ins. Co.

2001 Ohio 65, 91 Ohio St. 3d 334
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 11, 2001·No. 2001-0343·Published

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 334.]

DICKE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE.

[Cite as Dicke v. Safeco Ins. Co., 2001-Ohio-65.]

Insurance—Homeowner’s insurance policy that provides limited liability coverage for vehicles not subject to motor vehicle registration is not a motor vehicle liability policy and is not subject to the requirement of former R.C. 3937.18 to offer uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. (No. 01-343—Submitted March 28, 2001—Decided April 11, 2001.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Allen County, No. 1-2000-64.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 262, ___ N.E.2d ___. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents.

Gooding, Huffman, Kelley & Becker, L.L.C., T. Blain Brook II and Lawrence A. Huffman, for appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dicke v. Safeco Ins. Co., 2001 Ohio 65, 91 Ohio St. 3d 334 (Ohio 2001).

2001 Ohio 65 (Dicke v. Safeco Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dicke v. Safeco Insurance
744 N.E.2d 1162 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.
2001 Ohio 36 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)