Dick v. State
This text of 622 So. 2d 940 (Dick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have for review Dick v. State, 601 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), in which the court affirmed a sentence based on State v. Tripp, 591 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), quashed, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). This Court accepted jurisdiction because Tripp was then pending before this Court. Based on our holding in Tripp, it is clear that jurisdiction in the instant case was improvidently granted because review would be premature. Should Dick violate his probation, he will be entitled to rely on the principle established by our opinion in Tripp. As we can find no other basis for jurisdiction, we dismiss the petition for review.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
622 So. 2d 940, 187 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 204, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 494, 1993 WL 83068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dick-v-state-fla-1993.