Dick v. Moore

85 Ill. 66
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 Ill. 66 (Dick v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dick v. Moore, 85 Ill. 66 (Ill. 1877).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court:

In this case, the judgment was by default, on this service: ■ “I have duly served the within by reading the same to the within named Allen Dick, Stephen English and John Hester, as I am therein commanded.” The fourth section of the Practice Act provides that sheriffs shall return the writ “by or on the return day, with an indorsement of his service, the time of serving it,” etc. Here, there is no date to the return, or any time named when service was made. In this there was a total failure to comply with this requirement of the statute, and, as no appearance was entered, the court below erred in rendering judgment by default on this insufficient service.

The judgment of the court below must be reversed and the

• cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tobin v. Brooks
113 Ill. App. 79 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 Ill. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dick-v-moore-ill-1877.