Dick v. Leonori

135 N.Y.S. 1045

This text of 135 N.Y.S. 1045 (Dick v. Leonori) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dick v. Leonori, 135 N.Y.S. 1045 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

Under the circumstances disclosed by the record in this case, full costs to date, together with $10 costs of the motion, should have been imposed. Purcell v. Hoffman House, 131 App. Div. 239, 115 N. Y. Supp. 778; Palazzo v. Degnon-McLean Contracting Co., 115 App. Div. 172, 100 N. Y. Supp. 681; Dunham v. Hastings Co., 109 App. Div. 514, 96 N. Y. Supp. 313.

The order appealed from is modified, by imposing full costs, together with $10 motion costs, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunham v. Hastings Pavement Co.
109 A.D. 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Palazzo v. Degnon-McLean Contracting Co.
115 A.D. 172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Purcell v. Hoffman House
131 A.D. 239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 N.Y.S. 1045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dick-v-leonori-nyappterm-1912.