Dick v. Leonori
135 N.Y.S. 1045
Opinion
Under the circumstances disclosed by the record in this case, full costs to date, together with $10 costs of the motion, should have been imposed. Purcell v. Hoffman House, 131 App. Div. 239, 115 N. Y. Supp. 778; Palazzo v. Degnon-McLean Contracting Co., 115 App. Div. 172, 100 N. Y. Supp. 681; Dunham v. Hastings Co., 109 App. Div. 514, 96 N. Y. Supp. 313.
The order appealed from is modified, by imposing full costs, together with $10 motion costs, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dick v. Leonori, 135 N.Y.S. 1045 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).
135 N.Y.S. 1045 (Dick v. Leonori) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dunham v. Hastings Pavement Co.
109 A.D. 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Palazzo v. Degnon-McLean Contracting Co.
115 A.D. 172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Purcell v. Hoffman House
131 A.D. 239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)