Dick v. Heyer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dick v. Heyer

567 So. 2d 482, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6831, 1990 WL 129693

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 12, 1990

DocketNo. 90-1069

StatusPublished

This text of 567 So. 2d 482 (Dick v. Heyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dick v. Heyer, 567 So. 2d 482, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6831, 1990 WL 129693 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court did not err in granting the appellee’s motion for temporary injunction or in denying the appellant’s motion to dissolve the temporary injunction, we remand to the trial court to set a bond, retroactive to the date of entry of the temporary injunction, as required pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b). _ See MultiCredit, Inc. v. Ecoban Capital Ltd., 555 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court did not err in granting the appellee’s motion for temporary injunction or in denying the appellant’s motion to dissolve the temporary injunction, we remand to the trial court to set a bond, retroactive to the date of entry of the temporary injunction, as required pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b). _ See MultiCredit, Inc. v. Ecoban Capital Ltd., 555 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 So. 2d 482, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6831, 1990 WL 129693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dick-v-heyer-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack