Dick v. Doral Greens Ltd. Partnership

291 A.D.2d 245, 736 N.Y.S.2d 872, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1397

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered February 6, 2001, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and granted plaintiffs’ cross motion for an extension of time to serve the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion granted and the cross motion denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants-appellants, dismissing the complaint as against them.

We reverse and dismiss the complaint as against defendants-appellants herein for the reasons stated in Dick v Doral Greens Ltd. Partnership (289 AD2d 74). Concur — -Williams, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dick v. Doral Greens Ltd. Partnership, 291 A.D.2d 245, 736 N.Y.S.2d 872, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1397 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

291 A.D.2d 245 (Dick v. Doral Greens Ltd. Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dick v. Doral Greens Ltd. Partnership
289 A.D.2d 74 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)