Dick Burns, Inc. v. B & H Sales, Inc.

295 So. 2d 344, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7091
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 24, 1974·No. No. 74-209·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It does not appear that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing this cause for lack of prosecution under the circumstances reflected in the record. Reddish v. Forlines, 207 So.2d 703 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1968).

Affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., and MOORE, JOHN H., II, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dick Burns, Inc. v. B & H Sales, Inc., 295 So. 2d 344, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7091 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

295 So. 2d 344 (Dick Burns, Inc. v. B & H Sales, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reddish v. Forlines
207 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)