Dick Bond Associates, Inc. v. Oakland Consolidated Corp.
247 So. 2d 763, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6733
Opinion
On the basis of our review of the briefs, the record on appeal and the oral argument, we are of the opinion that the [764]*764appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The final judgment from which this appeal is taken is, therefore, affirmed. See Salter v. Knowles, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 138; Shuler v. Allen, Fla.1955, 76 So.2d 879; Mellet v. Henry, Fla.App.1959, 108 So.2d 69; and Good v. Douglas Gardens, Fla.1951, 50 So.2d 349.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dick Bond Associates, Inc. v. Oakland Consolidated Corp., 247 So. 2d 763, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6733 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).
247 So. 2d 763 (Dick Bond Associates, Inc. v. Oakland Consolidated Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Salter v. Knowles
97 So. 2d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)
Shuler v. Allen
76 So. 2d 879 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Mellet v. Henry
108 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)