DiCienzo v. Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DiCienzo v. Agency

56 A.D.2d 1149, 866 N.Y.S.2d 912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 1149 (DiCienzo v. Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DiCienzo v. Agency, 56 A.D.2d 1149, 866 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered September 17, 2007. The order denied the motion of The Niagara Venture to intervene.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

[1150]*1150Same memorandum as in Niagara Venture v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency (56 AD3d 1150 [2008]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Lunn, Fahey and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered September 17, 2007. The order denied the motion of The Niagara Venture to intervene.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

[1150]*1150Same memorandum as in Niagara Venture v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency (56 AD3d 1150 [2008]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Lunn, Fahey and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 1149, 866 N.Y.S.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dicienzo-v-agency-nyappdiv-2008.